No, the right solution is to properly implement the RTP payload format described in RFC 4175. This will require implementing: 1/ a new subclass of "MultiFramedRTPSink" - e.g., called "UncompressedVideoRTPSink" - for transmitting RTP packets of this payload format, and 2/ a new subclass of "MultiFramedRTPSource" - e.g., called "UncompressedVideoRTPSource" - for receiving RTP packets of this payload format.
--

Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/
_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel

Reply via email to