> Why are there casts to void* here? Because I want the 'void*' version of "operator<<" to be used, not the 'char*' version. I.e., I want the value to the right of "<<" to be printed as a %p, not as a %s
Once again, not all compiler warning messages indicate bugs. Ross Finlayson Live Networks, Inc. http://www.live555.com/
_______________________________________________ live-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
