The namespace would allow us to get away from the define which is a text
substitution and is what causes the clash.
However. What about something like
#if Defined(USE_LIVE555_NAMESPACES)
# define OPENLIVENS namespace {
# define CLOSELIVENS } // close namespace LIVE555
# define LIVENS LIVE555::
#else
# define OPENLIVENS
# define CLOSELIVENS }
# define LIVENS
#endif
Then they do not exist unless you disable the #define USE_LIVE555_NAMESPACES in
the main header
This message and any attachments contain confidential and proprietary
information, and may contain privileged information, belonging to one or more
affiliates of Windy City Wire Cable & Technology Products, LLC. No privilege is
waived by this transmission. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of such
information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in
error, please delete it from your system, destroy any printouts or copies of
it, and notify the sender immediately by e-mail or phone.
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ross Finlayson
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:05 AM
To: LIVE555 Streaming Media - development & use
Subject: Re: [Live-devel] Breaking change
may be the easiest solution for such issue is to wrap all Live555 functionality
in a namespace? And place "using namespace Live555;" somewhere in it's header.
Yes, that's certainly a possibility for the future. To date, however, I've
avoided using C++ namespaces, because I don't want to risk breaking older
compilers that might not support them.
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/
_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
