On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:51 PM Petr Mladek <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue 2025-02-11 14:24:35, Yafang Shao wrote: > > Add detailed comments to clarify the purpose of klp_add_nops() function. > > These comments are based on Petr's explanation[0]. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [0] > > Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> > > Cc: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> > > --- > > kernel/livepatch/core.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c > > index 0cd39954d5a1..5b2a52e7c2f6 100644 > > --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c > > +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c > > @@ -604,6 +604,9 @@ static int klp_add_object_nops(struct klp_patch *patch, > > * Add 'nop' functions which simply return to the caller to run > > * the original function. The 'nop' functions are added to a > > * patch to facilitate a 'replace' mode. > > + * > > + * The 'nop' entries are added only for functions which are currently > > + * livepatched but are no longer included in the new livepatch. > > */ > > The new comment makes perfect sense. But I would re-shuffle the text a bit > to to make it more clear that it is used only in the 'replace' mode. > Something like: > > /* > * Add 'nop' functions which simply return to the caller to run the original > * function. > * > * They are added only when the atomic replace mode is used and only for > * functions which are currently livepatched but are no longer included > * in the new livepatch. > */
Thanks for your suggestion. I’ll make the change in the next version. -- Regards Yafang
