Yes I noticed that you've done a huge amount of work. I asked about the IDE because that is how I conceptualize the object model. Once I understand that hopefully all the rest of it will come together for me.
One thing that Apple insists on when defining the user experience for a new application is to come up with a clear statement of purpose. Not only what it is its intended user base (casual, professional, etc.), but also what it is explicitly not intended for. What *can't* Lively do?. I've seen a couple of posts from Dan on his vision for Lively, but I still wonder, is it an educational environment, or is it something people can use to build commercial quality client-server applications? Smalltalk evolved in rather unexpected ways I think. I don't think I'm looking for Lively on Rails, but I am interested in applications that appeal to mainstream development needs. Steve On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Philip Weaver <[email protected]> wrote: > Emailing from phone. Back online in a day or so. Existing mockups > cover more than ide. They are maybe 10% complete and mainly for > inspiration. An overview at this point and existing ide mockups are > not necessarily accurate. Want to explore things like: zoom to morph, > zoom to selection, morph navigation via the main column browser, > multiple selection in a column stacks views in the next column, > contextual menu as a single column column browser maybe for zoom to > morph. Existing mockups need more simplification and some other > solutions. >
_______________________________________________ lively-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel
