Thanks for your interest!
One reason to leave out methods is that they can make the inspector complicated
when you want it to be simple.
If someone makes a project out of this here are several things to consider
Maybe a switch for methods vs other properties
Maybe distinguish inherited state from most local
Also it should be noted that we are considering putting some inspect
capabilities into the scripters to give a more complete object view while
reducing the number of items in the halo (and pie menus where applicable).
FWIW
- Dan
-----------
On Feb 6, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Milan Zimmermann wrote:
> Thanks Jens
>
> (I'd vote for methods in Explorer if there was a +1 :) )
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Jens Lincke
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi, Milan -
>>
>> we decided to not show them, but I missed them to... so maybe we should add
>> them again.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jens
>>
>> Am 06.02.2012 um 18:43 schrieb Milan Zimmermann:
>>
>>
>> PS: It also reminded me of this : it's Inspector shows methods -
>> unless I am missing something, the Lively explorer does not. Is that
>> something that is possible to add? (It is also item W1 on my wish list
>> http://lively-kernel.org/repository/webwerkstatt/users/mzimmerm/lively-bugs-and-wishes.xhtml
>> )
>> _______________________________________________
>> lively-kernel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> lively-kernel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel
_______________________________________________
lively-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel
