Guys,

I'm going to limit the scope of my current work to just fixing the triple (i.e. change it to plaintext string encoding, and the revert documentation). I'm unclear of the intended encoding of the other items we'd mentioned. I'll come back to them later.

Matt

Todd Fiala wrote:



On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Matthew Gardiner <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Todd/Jason,

    I'm happy to do this work, i.e. changes to
    GDBRemoteCommunicationServer.cpp and
    GDBRemoteCommunicationClient.cpp. (And to change the kalimba stub
    is easy). As I have just acquired commit access to lldb this could
    be a useful piece of work to introduce me to the Phabricator
    review process.


Great, have at it!

    A couple of questions remain, though.

    Todd's comment:


    "Are there any ramifications for
    your usage of lldb-platform, though? We’d need to change the
    receiver code
    of that, which would then differ based on which lldb-platform version
    you’re talking to."


    Is that meaning that there are installed lldb-platform binaries
    which will now be broken against a version of lldb which expects
    plain text triples? Is that a problem? (that is, __will__ people
    upgrade both lldb and lldb-platform separately).


Matthew, this was my misunderstanding. I had thought lldb-platform shipped with all the Apple platforms. They fixed my understanding - it only gets downloaded to devices as needed but doesn't live there. So this is a non-issue. As for llgs using it, that should not be an issue as llgs is just getting functional now and backwards support isn't a concern just yet.

    Todd, do you know if distribution_id, os_build, os_kernel need to
    converted to plain-text?


I added distribution_id to indicate the Linux distribution, since it looks like on Android that might be the only way I can tell Android and its Androidisms apart from a stock Linux. On Linux, it grabs the content from the lsb_release exe, which really could be anything. If we wanted to switch that to binary encoding, that should be fine. You could change that one.

Somebody else should probably comment on os_build/os_kernel.

    Jason, what is the problem with hostname? Previously you wrote
    that we are dealing with a user-specified string that may include
    non-alphanumeric characters. So in lldb/GDB-RSP context is a
    hostname different than that defined in
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc952?

    Matt

    Todd Fiala wrote:

        Cool - sounds all good to me since we don't have a backwards
        compatibility problem.  Now would be the time to do it :-)

        -Todd



        On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Jason Molenda
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:


            On Jul 25, 2014, at 7:08 AM, Todd Fiala <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

            > Hey Jason,
            >
            > I don’t know about llgs or how much work it would be to
        change
            the kalimba gdbserver stub.
            >
            > Currently GDBRemoteCommunicationServer, used by both
        llgs and
            lldb-platform, does send the triple as hex encoded via
        this code:
            >
            > response.PutCString("triple:");
            >
        response.PutCStringAsRawHex8(host_triple.getTriple().c_str());
            >
            > We can easily not do that as you suggest. Are there any
            ramifications for your usage of lldb-platform, though?
        We’d need
            to change the receiver code of that, which would then
        differ based
            on which lldb-platform version you’re talking to.

            It sounds like Matthew is open to changing the kalimba
        stub.  We
            should get rid of the hex-ascii strings (along with
            distribution_id, os_build, os_kernel) everywhere.
         lldb-platform
            is not bundled/distributed in any products so we don't have to
            worry about deployed versions.

            hostname is less clear-cut because there we're dealing with a
            user-specified string and that may include one of # $ } *.

            Personally, I wish the whole of gdb-remote protocol
        required the
            use of the binary packet escape protocol which says that
        any of
            these 4 metacharacters that is meant to be sent in the
        body of a
            packet is prefixed with } and is xor'ed with 0x20.  But
        that's not
            what the protocol says so we need to do these things..




-- Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> | 650-943-3180 <tel:650-943-3180>




        To report this email as spam click here
        <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/MZbqvYs5QwJvpeaetUwhCQ==>.




    Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in
    England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office
    Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge,
    CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom
    More information can be found at www.csr.com <http://www.csr.com>.
    Keep up to date with CSR on our technical blog, www.csr.com/blog
    <http://www.csr.com/blog>, CSR people blog, www.csr.com/people
    <http://www.csr.com/people>, YouTube, www.youtube.com/user/CSRplc
    <http://www.youtube.com/user/CSRplc>, Facebook,
    www.facebook.com/pages/CSR/191038434253534
    <http://www.facebook.com/pages/CSR/191038434253534>, or follow us
    on Twitter at www.twitter.com/CSR_plc
    <http://www.twitter.com/CSR_plc>.
    New for 2014, you can now access the wide range of products
    powered by aptX at www.aptx.com <http://www.aptx.com>.




--
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | 650-943-3180



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to