There are bugs in the old libs/headers. Same toolchain. On Jul 2, 2015 8:08 AM, "Chaoren Lin" <chaor...@google.com> wrote:
> I am statically linking against API-21. There are some bugs in the old > toolchains that can be avoided by doing this. Aside from this issue, the > resulting binary seem to run fine on API 10 devices (and passes most of the > test suite). > On Jul 2, 2015 02:33, "Tamas Berghammer" <tbergham...@google.com> wrote: > >> I agree with Pavel that the toolchain shouldn't generate any source code >> what is using a missing syscall. I checked the implementation of accept on >> Gingerbread (API-9) and it is using the right syscall ( >> https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/gingerbread-release/libc/arch-arm/syscalls/accept.S >> ). >> >> I am not sure what is causing this issue, but one of my guess is that you >> are statically linking against a wrong version of libc. >> >> >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D10887 >> >> EMAIL PREFERENCES >> http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits