dawn added a comment. Just an update to let you know I'm still working on this (and a hundred other things)...
================ Comment at: source/Expression/ClangExpressionParser.cpp:227 @@ +226,3 @@ + // for C++, and then we'll truly be able to follow the frame language. For now, + // we do "Want C -> get ObjC++", "Want ObjC -> get ObjC++" etc... But again, + // that is not a fundamental choice, it is an implementation necessity. ---------------- In the process of rewriting this patch, I realized I hadn't handled the "Want C -> get ObjC++" case, which, if the switch statement case for C is fixed to handle all the C variants, turns out to be needed. When that is fixed, we get a few new failures, including the test for the expr --language option. I'm trying to figure out how to rework those tests, but with everything enabling ObjC++ now, that's not so easy. http://reviews.llvm.org/D11102 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
