Yep, all good. I was planning on waiting for feedback first. I've checked on Linux but don't have a Windows box available at the moment.
On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > zturner added a subscriber: zturner. > zturner added a comment. > > Are there any plans to actually just kill dosep.py at some point? I know > you mentioned you want to do further cleanup, so I'm wondering if this is > just an incremental step towards a dosep'less world. Right. At this point dosep could have been hidden in a lib dir or just wholesale pulled into dotest.py, but it is now an implementation detail that can be refactored. > > I'll review this in more detail tomorrow, but please hold off on comitting > until I get a chance to test everything on Windows and make sure everything > still works. (I assume other people will want to do the same for their > platforms) Sure thing. The implementation I went with was minimal change to get the net result of the user experience being "just dotest.py", with concurrent test execution the default. > > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D12587 > > > > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
