emaste added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12899#246881, @tfiala wrote:
> @emaste, I'm adding you because I have no idea what the state of the *BSD > world is with regards to lldb-server. It looks like you might still use the > process monitor bits so lldb-server might not be interesting over there. We are still using the process monitor bits right now, but the eventual goal is to migrate to lldb-server or something equivalent. lldb-server does build on FreeBSD and I think it's worth having it in the default targets list so that we can catch build breakage early, even if the resulting binary isn't currently usable for us. http://reviews.llvm.org/D12899 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
