vkalintiris added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D13022#249823, @emaste wrote:
> Although it ought to remain on the same line, no? It shouldn't matter in this case. I just followed the order of the headers in the synopsis section of shm_open(3) on my system. However, I noticed that we should use fcntl.h instead of sys/fcntl.h. The former is POSIX-compatible while the latter (based on my understanding) is being used to expose additional kernel-defines in some systems. Does this look good to you? http://reviews.llvm.org/D13022 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
