ovyalov added inline comments. ================ Comment at: source/Host/posix/DomainSocket.cpp:74 @@ +73,3 @@ + FileSystem::Unlink(FileSpec{name, true}); + + Error error; ---------------- labath wrote: > If we're going to use unique names, then this won't be necessary (and I would > much rather see a random error opening a socket than a random file > disappearing). BTW, have you considered using abstract sockets for the > lldb-server use case? Albeit linux-specific, I find them much nicer, as they > have no connection to the file system whatsoever. I was thinking about using abstract sockets but didn't try them in runtime on Android - will check.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13754 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits