ovyalov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: source/Host/posix/DomainSocket.cpp:74
@@ +73,3 @@
+ FileSystem::Unlink(FileSpec{name, true});
+
+ Error error;
----------------
labath wrote:
> If we're going to use unique names, then this won't be necessary (and I would
> much rather see a random error opening a socket than a random file
> disappearing). BTW, have you considered using abstract sockets for the
> lldb-server use case? Albeit linux-specific, I find them much nicer, as they
> have no connection to the file system whatsoever.
I was thinking about using abstract sockets but didn't try them in runtime on
Android - will check.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13754
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
