dawn added a comment. Jim, this patch doesn't attempt to fix the issue I raised in my comment - it just fixes the oversight of other C variants (clang picks C99 for example) and renames your function to a more meaningful name (and matches Mangled::GuessLanguage which is also uses the name to guess the language). I see no reason why to reject it.
I didn't want to try and tackle the bigger problem in this patch, but wanted to raise the question so I might know how to resolve it in a different patch. Thank you for the feedback however - I like your "Any" suggestion and will submit another patch for it. Please accept this patch? Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D15175 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
