jingham added a comment. Provided we error out appropriately I don't think we need to support all possible combinations of options. I'd happier doing it by options and not supporting the combinations that aren't worth the effort. Then if anybody really needs one of the unsupported ones, the path to adding the support will be straight-forward, even if tedious.
The options seem to me to actually explain what the variants do, whereas the two names are not going to be meaningful enough to most folks to do more than cause confusion (and force me to have to type "line-t" or "line-e".) Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D15593 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
