granata.enrico added a comment. That seems reasonable, yes.
In general, I wish I had done this not via two strings - only one of which gets to be valid in some arbitrary order - but via either two distinct subclasses, or at least via a pair of a string and an enum class specifying the kind. But that is clearly beyond the scope of you fixing this test case. Your change is fine. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D16703 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
