tfiala added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16858#343895, @labath wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16858#343140, @tfiala wrote: > > > BTW I was planning on re-organizing the lldb-server/debugserver tests > > sometime in the near future to break them into many different directories > > and pull off the dsym/dwarf/dwo changes for the many tests where that > > doesn't matter. > > > I think that basically none of these tests rely on debug info, and we can > remove the debug info duplication entirely. Unfortunately, the only way right > now is to annotate each function with `@no_debug_info_test`, so I have been > waiting until I get a chance to make that decorator work on classes. > > That should cut the running time in half, so then you may not even need to > split stuff out more... True. Maybe I'll wait until then. If/when I get to writing more tests in that area, I may reorganize just because it is currently a massive hunk of tests in one file, but if you're going to get rid of the alternatives with a class-level decorator, that definitely will remove the main piece I cared about (namely, the time). Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D16858 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
