On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Adrian McCarthy <amcca...@google.com> wrote: > It looks like this patch reorders the #includes in a way that seems contrary > to general practice. In particular, if foo.cpp has a header foo.h, then it > should include foo.h before any other files. This helps ensure that foo.h > can stand alone and won't require clients to have to figure out what else > must be included. > > http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#include-style > > I know LLDB doesn't always follow LLVM guidelines, but this seems pretty > common and intentional.
I try to follow headers section comments. Eugene. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
