krytarowski added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685#417896, @zturner wrote:
> I don't think we should be adding more CMake hacks in lldb when llvm is > supposed to handle this. Why don't the existing lines work? I don't know. Perhaps because LLVM and Clang requires newer cmake than 2.8.11. I tested locally with setting the minimal required version to 2.8.12.2 and LLDB builds. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits