Michael137 wrote: Yea I agree, I think this makes things easier to reason about. And if the "no-DW_AT_byte_size on definition" case comes up, that can be addressed differently.
> We could do that, but then we'd also need to do that in > ParseStructureLikeDIE. And we may need to figure out what does it mean to > occupy a non-whole number of bytes, so I'd say that's orthogonal to this. Yup, since it wasn't there before, happy to defer it. > The problem is really specific to this place in the code, where we've already > completed the clang type, but we haven't created the layout for it. Ack https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110648 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
