Michael137 wrote: > > Skipping empty fields does seem like a better heuristic here > > FWIW, I (independently) came to the same conclusion when investigating the > fallout of #76756, though it's not fully clear to me whether the PR has been > updated to do that.
Not yet, but will have a look at this today https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97443 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
