Michael137 wrote: > I'd probably use a test category for this (either the existing libc++ > category, or if that doesn't fit your use case for some reason, then a new > category created specifically for this purpose).
Agreed, that would be preferable. Is the suggestion to run something like: ``` ./bin/llvm-lit --param dotest-args='-G libc++ -G dataformatters' ../llvm-project/lldb/test/API/ ``` Instead of a ninja target? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110856 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
