+1. One of the points I outlined on my list was to use llvm streams. So
that also solves the problem
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:54 AM Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote:
> On 22 September 2016 at 01:00, Greg Clayton via lldb-commits
> <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > If you use a StringRef in printf, please use "%*s" and then put the
> count and data pointer into the printf, so the above line would become:
> >
> > + s->Printf("source regex = \"%*s\", exact_match = %d",
> > + (int)m_regex.GetText().size(), m_regex.GetText().data(),
> m_exact_match);
>
> I think this is a very good argument to use a c++-like api for
> streams/logging:
>
> s << "source regex = \"" << m_regex.GetText() << "\", exact_match = "
> << m_exact_match;
>
> It's shorter and much less error-prone.
>
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
