================
@@ -246,6 +246,8 @@ class Mangled {
/// for s, otherwise the enumerator for the mangling scheme detected.
static Mangled::ManglingScheme GetManglingScheme(llvm::StringRef const name);
+ static bool IsCPPMangledName(llvm::StringRef name);
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
How about calling this `IsMangledName` and. dropping the CPP/Cxx part
altogether? Confusingly the implementation isn't actually checking if the
mangling scheme is Itanium, so. this will fire too for Rust and Swift. Maybe
something (like Rust) is relying on that, I don't know.
```suggestion
static bool IsMangledName(llvm::StringRef name);
```
That would also provide some parity with this oddly named helper function:
```
static inline bool cstring_is_mangled(llvm::StringRef s) {
return Mangled::GetManglingScheme(s) != Mangled::eManglingSchemeNone;
}
```
The current name makes it look like it should really belong in the C++ language
plugin, where it was previously.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132274
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
