================
@@ -73,6 +73,97 @@ TEST(NativeProcessProtocolTest, SetBreakpointFailVerify) {
llvm::Failed());
}
+TEST(NativeProcessProtocolTest, RemoveSoftwareBreakpoint) {
+ NiceMock<MockDelegate> DummyDelegate;
+ MockProcess<NativeProcessProtocol> Process(DummyDelegate,
+ ArchSpec("x86_64-pc-linux"));
+ auto Trap = cantFail(Process.GetSoftwareBreakpointTrapOpcode(1));
+ auto Original = std::vector<uint8_t>{0xbb};
+
+ // Set up a breakpoint.
+ {
+ InSequence S;
+ EXPECT_CALL(Process, ReadMemory(0x47, 1))
+ .WillOnce(Return(ByMove(Original)));
+ EXPECT_CALL(Process, WriteMemory(0x47, Trap)).WillOnce(Return(ByMove(1)));
+ EXPECT_CALL(Process, ReadMemory(0x47, 1)).WillOnce(Return(ByMove(Trap)));
+ EXPECT_THAT_ERROR(Process.SetBreakpoint(0x47, 0, false).ToError(),
+ llvm::Succeeded());
+ }
----------------
labath wrote:
A helper function is one way. Another is to provide a default implementation of
the read/write functions (using `ON_CALL`) that would "emulate" emulate a real
memory (by using the "address" as an index into a vector). That way you'd only
need to program the assertions that you intend to check.
However, I think this is fine. This file doesn't get a lot of traffic.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148738
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
