DavidSpickett wrote: We had a discussion about preferring one or the other PDB implementation but I don't recall the conclusion. I think this is just for reading PDB, right? Clang is going to use llvm's libraries to *write* PDB and of course MSVC is using Microsoft's implementation.
I think a few XFAILs would be worth it if we can say lldb + MSVC toolchain works out of the box. If we can get it to be an extra mode on top of DWARF/DWO/dysym I can add it to Linaro's Windows bot for sure. Assuming I can stick with clang as the test compiler. The formatters are not my area of expertise, so if @Michael137 does not want the complexity without regular testing, I suggest we respect that. Might be useful for your own purposes to split out the PDB bit and keep it for later. > I experimented with PDB in API tests a bit, and it seems to workbut requires > a few xfail annotations. Then could you put up a PR for, or just explain how, you did this? I can try it out with or bot's existing configuration. We can work towards getting some testing of PDB, whatever form it happens to be in, and then you can have future PRs with PDB support too. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148554 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
