jingham accepted this revision.
jingham added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

This looks fine.

It reads a little odd to me that the BreakpointSP recipient of GetSP is 
generally called opaque_sp after the patch.  Historically it makes sense 
because it was the result of the substitution m_opaque_sp -> opaque_sp.  But if 
you didn't know that it might seem odd, since there's nothing opaque about it.  
Something like "bkpt_sp" would read more naturally.  OTOH is does make the 
patch larger, so I don't feel very strongly about it.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D30249



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to