================
@@ -538,15 +539,156 @@ void CPlusPlusLanguage::CxxMethodName::Parse() {
}
}
-llvm::StringRef
-CPlusPlusLanguage::CxxMethodName::GetBasenameNoTemplateParameters() {
- llvm::StringRef basename = GetBasename();
- size_t arg_start, arg_end;
- llvm::StringRef parens("<>", 2);
- if (ReverseFindMatchingChars(basename, parens, arg_start, arg_end))
- return basename.substr(0, arg_start);
+bool CPlusPlusLanguage::CxxMethodName::NameMatches(llvm::StringRef full_name,
+ llvm::StringRef pattern,
+ MatchOptions options) {
+ constexpr llvm::StringRef abi_prefix = "[abi:";
----------------
da-viper wrote:
the abi_tag may be in the template i.e `Module<SomeType[abi:TAG]>::find` and
will fail.
and we also compare the tag names in case in the future we add support for
`breakpoint set --name foo[abi:TAG]`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170527
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
