labath added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30984#711806, @EricWF wrote:
> I don't see anything wrong with this, but I only know libc++ and not LLDB. I'm not sure why you ended up here. I think you have too wide phabricator filter somewhere. :) > > >> libc++'s atomic does not play well with gcc on linux > > It should... Can you elaborate on this issue? I suspect this may be a libc++ > bug. It checks for `#if __has_feature(cxx_atomic)` and then aborts if it is not found. However, this is in the system libc++ on ubuntu (lldb uses system libc++ for reasons which are too long to go into right now), which is quite old. I don't see a similar check in the current trunk, so it's possible that has been fixed since then. https://reviews.llvm.org/D30984 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
