DavidSpickett wrote: Same issue in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56268.
> Reading the history there, it seems like it was agreed that this behaviour > (skipping over unknown bps) was the desired end goal. That's my recollection too. I know there are some tests that rely on us stopping on unknown breakpoints, but not on this not being able to continue aspect. They can be fixed if there are any. Will do a proper review of this PR later. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174348 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
