jimingham wrote: > I think the code is right and the test clever. > > I had a suggestion for making it a little easier to read which you can take > or not as you wish. But I do think you need to add a comment as this is not > obvious. > > Also, if this wouldn't also be fixed by resetting m_stopped_at_unexpected_bp > for every thread, even the ones we didn't allow to run, explain why to me > because it means I've missed something in thinking about the patch. I don't > think that's the right solution, but yours should be equivalent to clearing > them all on every resume and resetting them all on every stop.
Ah, okay. That makes sense. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174264 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
