Right, This patch happened to does not fully work for me (NetBSD-CORE@ switches were skipped), I will be back to it once I will get my current efforts done on watchpoints and fpr.
Thank you for the initial scratch! On 11.04.2017 17:14, Zachary Turner wrote: > Just to be clear, this patch was only intended to be a starting point. I > didn't run the test suite or do anything other than verify that the core > loaded. ArchSpec is a pretty core class so touching it in this manner is > likely to have many side effects that you'll need to work out. > > Most likely so many tests fail on NetBSD that it masks the regressions, > but you should at least be able to diff your test results before/after > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 6:12 AM Kamil Rytarowski via Phabricator > <revi...@reviews.llvm.org <mailto:revi...@reviews.llvm.org>> wrote: > > krytarowski added a comment. > > I might need some guidance to address the asserts appropriately in > finite time. > > In general we set osabi to generic unix (value 0), and NetBSD > core(5) files are distinguished only (or mostly) with "NetBSD-CORE*" > notes. > > > Repository: > rL LLVM > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D31825 > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
