Michael137 wrote: > > Allows API tests to pass SBExpressionOptions when testing a successful > > expression evaluation with expect_expr. > > Which tests and for what reasons? > > Change is fine code wise, but I don't immediately see what I'd do with this.
I have an upcoming patch that adds an option to `SBExpressionOptions`. I would like to use `expect_expr` in those tests. Not super critical, but it makes the tests slightly nicer to read. I'll wait on merging this PR once all the follow-up PRs are up, so there's examples of what it looks like https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/177920 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
