clayborg resigned from this revision. clayborg added a reviewer: jingham. clayborg added a comment.
Jim, can you take a look at this and see if this could be fixed in a nicer way? I would prefer to not see anything related to delay slots in a test. Can we abstract this better? Maybe ask the SBInstruction() if you can set a breakpoint on it instead of speaking in delay slot terms? Or maybe we ask the SBInstructionList to count the number of instructions between two addresses? Maybe something like: uint32_t SBInstructionList::GetInstructionCount(const SBAddress &start, const SBAddress &end); Or improve the test so it doesn't rely on instruction count?? https://reviews.llvm.org/D32168 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
