krytarowski added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33035#751280, @clayborg wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33035#751264, @krytarowski wrote:
>
> > Can we please use the generic process plugin code, not the specific Linux 
> > one? If the generic code is insufficient - we should adjust it and alter 
> > instances of it (Linux and BSD).
>
>
> There should be no need to ever #include something from a plug-in in code the 
> gets loaded externally. We should rely on the error strings themselves, not 
> be comparing them to some value. SBError has an error type (generic, posix, 
> mach-kernel, expression results, windows). It we are going to do anything we 
> can make up a new set of them, but the code in this patch is relying on the 
> values, when it should just be using the string value. If the string value 
> wasn't set correctly, fix that is the code that creates the errors.


Thank you for explanation. This is even better and ideal.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D33035



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to