Author: jingham
Date: Wed May 31 20:05:30 2017
New Revision: 304379
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=304379&view=rev
Log:
Forgot to mention rewriting CommandObject::DoExecute
using the SB API's not the lldb_private API's.
Modified:
lldb/trunk/www/projects.html
Modified: lldb/trunk/www/projects.html
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/www/projects.html?rev=304379&r1=304378&r2=304379&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/www/projects.html (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/www/projects.html Wed May 31 20:05:30 2017
@@ -244,6 +244,25 @@
</li>
<li>
+ Reimplement the command
interpreter commands using the SB API
+ <p>
+ Currently, all the
CommandObject::DoExecute methods are implemented
+ using the lldb_private API's.
That generally means that there's code
+ that gets duplicated between
the CommandObject and the SB API that does
+ roughly the same thing. We
would reduce this code duplication, present a
+ single coherent face to the
users of lldb, and keep
+ ourselves more honest about
what we need in the SB API's if we implemented
+ the CommandObjects::DoExecute
methods using the SB API's.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ BTW, it is only the way it was
much easier to develop lldb if it had a functioning
+ command-line early on. So we
did that first, and developed the SB API's when lldb
+ was more mature. There's no
good technical reason to have the commands use the
+ lldb_private API's.
+ </p>
+ </li>
+
+ <li>
Documentation and better examples
<p>
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
