================
@@ -270,6 +272,57 @@ size_t MemoryCache::Read(addr_t addr, void *dst, size_t 
dst_len,
   return dst_len;
 }
 
+llvm::SmallVector<llvm::MutableArrayRef<uint8_t>>
+MemoryCache::ReadRanges(llvm::ArrayRef<Range<lldb::addr_t, size_t>> ranges,
+                        llvm::MutableArrayRef<uint8_t> buffer) {
+  std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(m_mutex);
+
+  llvm::SmallVector<llvm::MutableArrayRef<uint8_t>> results;
+  results.reserve(ranges.size());
+  llvm::SmallVector<Range<lldb::addr_t, size_t>> missed_ranges;
+
+  // Iterate once serving requests from L1.
+  for (auto range : ranges) {
+    const lldb::addr_t addr = range.GetRangeBase();
+    const size_t len = range.GetByteSize();
+
+    if (m_invalid_ranges.FindEntryThatContains(addr)) {
+      results.push_back(buffer.take_front(0));
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    if (const uint8_t *l1_data = FindL1CacheEntry(addr, len)) {
+      results.push_back(buffer.take_front(len));
+      buffer = buffer.drop_front(len);
+      memcpy(results.back().data(), l1_data, len);
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    // Use a nullptr to denote this needs fetching.
+    results.emplace_back(nullptr, nullptr);
+    missed_ranges.push_back(range);
+  }
+
+  if (missed_ranges.empty())
+    return results;
+
+  auto fetched_buffers = m_process.DoReadMemoryRanges(missed_ranges, buffer);
+
+  for (auto [missed_range, fetched] : llvm::zip(missed_ranges, 
fetched_buffers))
+    AddL1CacheData(missed_range.GetRangeBase(), fetched);
+
+  auto *results_it = results.begin();
+  auto *end = results.end();
+  for (auto fetched : fetched_buffers) {
+    results_it = std::find_if(
----------------
felipepiovezan wrote:

Please have a look at the top commit for the precise diff!

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/201166
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to