phoebewang wrote:

> > [SPARC] Add missing dynamic tags handling in llvm-readobj and LLDB
> 
> This is not true? They were already handled, but treated as 
> architecture-independent, not specific to SPARC.

Makes sense. Changed.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206316
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to