clayborg added inline comments.

================
Comment at: source/Host/common/Symbols.cpp:288-294
+              // FIXME: at the moment llvm-dwp doesn't output build ids,
+              // nor does binutils dwp. Thus in the case of DWPs
+              // we skip uuids check. This needs to be fixed
+              // to avoid consistency issues as soon as
+              // llvm-dwp and binutils dwp gain support for build ids.
+              if (file_spec.GetFileNameExtension().GetStringRef() == "dwp" ||
+                  mspec.GetUUID() == module_uuid)
----------------
tberghammer wrote:
> What do you think about adding a new argument to 
> Symbols::LocateExecutableSymbolFile (with a potential default value) to 
> specify if we want to check the UUID and then move this logic to the place 
> where we are looking for the dwp file? I think that would make dwp specific 
> logic more concise in one place.
An easier fix is to clear the UUID field from in "module_spec" _before_ you 
call this function. The module spec can be filled in as much as is needed, so 
either clear the UUID in module_spec if it is set, or just don't set it. This 
function should ignore the UUID comparison if the UUID field is not valid in 
module_spec, so if it isn't doing this, then it should


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D38568



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to