On 15 October 2017 at 23:04, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > Doesn’t DisableAllLogChannels acquire a scoped lock? If so wouldn’t it just > release at the end of the function?
The thing is, it is unable to acquire the lock in the first place, because the mutex is already "locked". So, the sequence of events is process 1, thread 1: acquire lock process 1, thread 2: fork(), process 2 is created process 1 thread 1: release lock everything goes well from now on in process 1... process 2, thread one (and only). acquire lock: BANG. Process 2 is deadlocked because there is noone to release the lock there. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
