clayborg added a comment. Jim will need to ok this. A few concerns follow. Most of the time when we don't get the DWARF -> AST conversion right, it can mean that we might code gen incorrect code. Is there not enough information for the GNU abi_tag in the DWARF to actually re-create these classes correctly in the AST? My first inclination would be to fix that if possible. If there is info missing from the DWARF such that we can't re-create the AST correctly, then it seems that this approach will help. Can you clarify what the GNU abi_tag stuff does? Will it change how code would be generated? If we have things in the AST that aren't correct, but have been fixed by correcting the "asm" tag, will we JIT up bad code? -
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40283 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
