clayborg added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42145#994556, @labath wrote:
> I think we're slowly getting there, but we could cleanup the implementation a > bit. > > I am also not sure that the `WriteObjectFile` name really captures what this > function does, but I don't have a suggestion for a better name either.... Looking at the API I wouldn't immediately assume that WriteObjectFile would be flash aware and WriteMemory wouldn't... How about we add a new parameter to Process::WriteMemory that like "bool write_flash". It can default to false. Then if this is true, then we do the extra legwork to try and figure out the memory map. If false, just write the memory. https://reviews.llvm.org/D42145 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
