probinson added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32167#1020032, @labath wrote:
> Running the entire dotest test suite in -fdebug-types-section is certainly a > good way to catch problems, but it's not the way to write regression tests. Is there testing in place that is more serious/thorough than the normal regression testing? It might be reasonable to do the full cartesian set at a slower pace. For example LLVM has the concept of "expensive checks" and there are a small number of bots out there that enable them. But it's not something anybody runs normally. https://reviews.llvm.org/D32167 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
