asmith added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47708#1123334, @labath wrote:
> I have reverted this because of the broken tests. > > However, I have to also ask: isn't there better way to test this? (one that > does not depend on opaque checked-in binaries). On linux, I could check-in a > .s file which has the line table exactly as I want it and then have the test > assert that. Is there some suitable intermediate form here? > > It seems that lld tests use some yaml form to store pdb's. Is there any > chance we could do the same? I wish these binaries didn’t exist too. Im not sure if the lld approach works because I think we need the VS generated PDBs for function level testing. Maybe Zachary as a better idea. https://reviews.llvm.org/D47708 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
