aprantl added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47991#1138029, @jingham wrote:
> Won't this break client code that was calling StepOver? We are pretty > serious about maintaining binary compatibility with the SB API's. Yeah, we can't replace existing function calls: The C++ name mangling could change, and the calling convention could change, too, depending on how big SBError is. https://reviews.llvm.org/D47991 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
