Sure, that also sounds fine. Jim
> On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:55 AM, Dave Lee via Phabricator > <revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > > kastiglione added a comment. > > Thanks @jingham. > >> if the `IOHandlerDelegate` could say whether it wants to be notified for >> `IOHandlerActivated` when non-interactive (like have a >> "`ShouldNotifyWhenNonInteractive`" method), and then the `IOHandler` could >> dispatch it or not based on the response to that method > > So the "`ShouldNotifyWhenNonInteractive`" would only control whether > `IOHandlerActivated` is called, not any of the other `IOHandlerDelegate` > methods? > > What do you think about adding a `IOHandlerActivatedInteractively`delegate > method? This could be called in addition to > `IOHandlerActivatedInteractively`, but only for interactive IO? > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D48752 > > > _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
