clayborg added a comment. I would be all for adding a "none" as a valid vendor, os or environment to the llvm triple class. Then all of the unspecified unknown stuff goes away. But I am not sure how likely the LLVM community will like this change since it won't be useful for non LLDB code.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58653/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58653 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
