teemperor added a comment. In D61244#1482146 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61244#1482146>, @labath wrote:
> LG, but note that this has no effect on the overall set of tests which will > run as long as gmodules remains disabled in > `test_categories.is_supported_on_platform`. Oh, true, thanks for the hint! With the current categories it seems the test always just get's marked as PASS (TM) on Linux... But luckily it actually passes even when I enable linux in the category filter. > The other thing to note is that the effect of enabling gmodules extremely > strongly depends on how your system is configured. (Almost) none of our test > define their own modules, so the only modules that lldb might end up using > are the ones from the system libraries. Which is kind of way I think our way > of testing module debugging support is broken. We have enough problems with > people reporting tests which only break for them because of some quirk in > their system libraries without us throwing modules into the mix. It's true that the `gmodules-templates` test touches system modules. I'm fine with rewriting them to not use system modules (or disable the ones that really have to use system modules on LInux) as long as we have some gmodules coverage on Linux. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61244/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61244 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
