labath added a comment. In D61732#1497609 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61732#1497609>, @jasonmolenda wrote:
> I'm not super concerned about the size of the UnwindPlan or FuncUnwinders > objects - we create them lazily as we unwind through functions in the > process, so my guess is that even a long-running debug session will have on > the order of thousands of these objects. The ABIs don't even bother to issue > a single ArchDefault unwind plan and FunctionEntry unwind plan, handing out a > new one for each FuncUnwinders object (ok that part is a little embarrassing, > but again this isn't super high on the priority list to fix imo.) Ok, sounds good. I'll whip up a patch to merge the _sp and _tried fields into one entity. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61732/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61732 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
