xiaobai added a comment. In D64591#1581820 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64591#1581820>, @jingham wrote:
> Then the IRDynamicCheck part would go with LLVMUserExpression, and the > C-specific checks in Clang... Except IRDynamicChecks has special knowledge of the clang-specific instrumenters. I can think of another way in which DynamicCheckerFunctions and IRDynamicChecks are more generic classes that will work with any language. I can try to explore that option to see what I come up with, maybe the end result will be better? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64591/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64591 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
